"Asked whether Justin Fields would remain his starting quarterback next week against Carolina, Glenn said, "What kind of question is that?" After watching Fields look totally lost against the Broncos, I would say it's a good one. But is it an overreaction? Oh, I'm so glad you asked. Let's tackle that and a few other potential overreactions to NFL Week 6 games, sizing up which ones are legitimate and which ones are irrational. (And we will also hit a few fantasy football topics at the bottom.)"
"Fields was 9-for-17 for 45 passing yards against the Broncos, and because he took nine sacks for a total of 55 lost yards, the Jets finished the game with minus-10 net passing yards. This happened in the year 2025 ... when the forward pass has been legal for over a century. Fields didn't do much with his legs, either, rushing seven times for 31 yards. Overall, the team had 82 total yards of offense and went 2-for-15 on third down."
Justin Fields struggled versus the Broncos, completing 9 of 17 passes for 45 yards while absorbing nine sacks for 55 lost yards, leaving the Jets with minus-10 net passing yards. The offense totaled 82 yards, rushed seven times for 31 yards, and converted just 2-of-15 on third down. New York's defense kept the game close, producing a third-quarter safety and a temporary 11-10 lead before a late Broncos field goal. The performance raises questions about whether Fields should be benched. Other Week 6 topics include reactions about Maye, the Cowboys' defensive needs, the Jaguars' 4-1 start, Buccaneers' health, and fantasy takeaways.
Read at ESPN.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]