The editorial critiques a proposed budget provision in New York that may allow taxpayer dollars to fund Attorney General Letitia James' legal defense against personal mortgage fraud allegations. The argument posits that taxpayers should not bear the financial burden for an official's private wrongdoing, especially when the misconduct does not relate to their government duties. Critics emphasize the need for accountability and suggest that established legal mechanisms, like public defenders, suffice for defendants needing representation without involving taxpayer money.
Considering that James' mantra is 'no one is above the law,' why should she be granted special treatment? Is she more privileged than any other financially challenged defendant?
This budget proposal is designed to protect James, and probably other Democratic officials. It will basically absolve her of taking personal responsibility for her actions.
Collection
[
|
...
]