Miley Cyrus faced critique for her album preview, where reviewers claimed her music was 'too good' for pop. In a conversation with Zane Lowe, she defended pop music, citing icons like David Bowie as examples of its artistic potential. Cyrus argues against the notion that pop is merely a disposable genre, promoting a poptimist perspective that recognizes pop's capability for depth and excellence. The article explores the subjective definitions of 'good' music, suggesting Cyrus's album may blur the lines between sophisticated artistry and pleasurable entertainment.
Cyrus expressed that pop music is often unfairly labeled as generic and lazy, countering that true pop can indeed possess depth and quality.
Upon previewing 'Something Beautiful', critics found it paradoxically 'too good' for pop, highlighting the tension between pleasure and perceived artistic integrity.
Cyrus illustrated the poptimist perspective, arguing that just because music may cater to the masses, it doesn't mean it can't showcase excellence.
The article reflects on the subjective nature of what constitutes 'good' music, asserting that depth of quality in pop shouldn't be dismissed.
Collection
[
|
...
]