Hanif Abdurraqib on Ellen Willis's Review of Elvis in Las Vegas
Briefly

Hanif Abdurraqib on Ellen Willis's Review of Elvis in Las Vegas
"I have very little interest in Elvis Presley's music, and I have even less interest in the mythology of Elvis as a Towering Figure in American Music. What I am abundantly interested in is resurrection, which means there are corners of the Elvis narrative that, when well illuminated, I find myself hovering over with fascination, or a kind of morbid pleasure. Ellen Willis's 1969 review of an Elvis concert, the singer's first in nine years, drew me right in."
"There is no single thing that makes a writer like Willis great, but what makes her work compelling, and what most informs my own writing, is that Willis- The New Yorker's first pop-music critic-was never afraid to be overtaken by unexpected delight, even if it came at the expense of some preƫxisting skepticism. Those two traits-skepticism and the potential for pleasure-exist at the intersection of Las Vegas and Elvis, especially during the summer of 1969."
"The Elvis whom Willis witnessed was, in fact, a man resurrected, not from the dead but from a long stretch of dissatisfaction with his own career path, which had led to film roles and soundtrack recordings and away, largely, from the stage. The previous year had marked a turnaround: there was the triumph of his comeback special, which was shot in June and aired in December."
A 1969 Elvis concert, the singer's first in nine years, signaled a career resurrection after a long stretch of film roles and soundtrack recordings that moved him away from the stage. The previous year's televised comeback special, shot in June and aired in December, marked a turning point. Conquering Las Vegas became the proof of a full return, with the city resembling Hollywood in its spectacle. Observers noted a mix of skepticism and unexpected delight as Elvis appeared slimmer and more energized, delivering a performance that combined renewed sexual magnetism with authentic enjoyment.
Read at The New Yorker
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]