"The majority of people prefer that only folded dimensions are used when filtering phones based on their thickness, width and height. People had a simple reason for voting this way - most of the time, the phones stay folded. You carry them closed, of course, but with the rapid improvement of cover displays (especially on flip foldables), you can get a lot done without opening the phone."
"The other large group prefers filtering by the folded thickness, but using the unfolded dimensions for width and height. The thinking behind this choice is similar, though the scales tip the other way - you still carry the phone folded, but you use it open more often than you do closed. The two different styles of foldables do tend to be used differently, which makes it harder to come up with a single solution that works well for both."
A majority of respondents prefer using only folded dimensions when filtering foldable phones by thickness, width, and height, because phones are usually carried closed and cover displays enable many tasks without opening. A second sizable group prefers filtering using folded thickness but unfolded width and height, reflecting more frequent open use. Foldable and flip styles tend to be used differently, complicating a single optimal filtering approach. Comments and suggestions were reviewed and will be considered. The interface must balance intuitiveness for new users with advanced filtering power. Updates to the Phone Finder and the underlying database will require additional time.
Read at GSMArena.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]