"The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a major upgrade from its predecessor - the roomy 4.1" cover display with a regular shape makes using the phone when closed so much easier than the weirdly-shaped 3.4" display on the Z Flip6 ever did. Also, the new model is thinner (6.5mm opened and 13.7mm closed vs. 6.9mm and 14.9mm) with a larger 4,300mAh battery (+300mAh over its predecessor) to boot."
"The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 is named after the best flip phone back in the old days. It features a 4.0" cover and a 7.0" inner display (vs. 6.9" on the Samsung). Both phones are rated IP48 for basic ingress protection and resistance against submersion. The Razr does use the Snapdragon 8 Elite that you may have expected out of the Samsung. And it has more RAM to boot, 16GB vs. 12GB. It lacks Ready For support, however, which is Motorola's alternative to DeX."
"With a larger 4,700mAh battery, the Moto Razr Ultra 2025 lasts longer (15:10h vs. 11:52h Active Use score). The 68W wired charging is a lot faster than Samsung's 25W too. In half an hour, it gets the phone to 78%, compared to 46% (despite having to fill a battery that is 400mAh larger). A full charge takes half the time - 45 minutes vs. 1 hour 31 minutes. Wireless charging is faster too, 30W vs. 15W."
Two flagship foldable flip phones target different priorities. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 gains a roomier 4.1" cover display, thinner dimensions, a 4,300mAh battery, Exynos 2500 performance, and DeX support, but retains the same camera hardware. The Motorola Razr Ultra 2025 offers a 4.0" cover, 7.0" inner panel, Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset, 16GB RAM, and a larger 4,700mAh battery with much faster 68W wired and 30W wireless charging. Both carry IP48 ratings. Software commitment differs sharply: Samsung promises seven OS updates while Motorola offers three OS updates plus an extra year of security patches.
Read at GSMArena.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]