Opinions within the Labour Party are split over the early endorsement of presidential candidate Catherine Connolly. Some party members privately believe the early endorsement reflects poorly on leader Ivana Bacik’s judgment. Those objectors have declined to go on the record. A majority of members are publicly explaining and defending the party’s position, framing the endorsement as the outcome of a democratic choice. Many are making allowances for Bacik’s stance despite private reservations. The split signals sensitivity about timing and optics in candidate endorsements and suggests ongoing internal debate about strategic decision-making.
Opinions are divided in the Labour ­Party over the wisdom of endorsing presidential candidate Catherine Connolly so early, with some privately saying it reflects poorly on the judgment of leader Ivana Bacik. None of the objectors would go on the record, while a majority are explaining the party's position and making allowances for Ms Bacik's stance, saying it is the result of democratic choice.
Questions for Ivana Bacik after Independent's 'vibe' did not go down well with some in party
Collection
[
|
...
]