Mental competency questioned in fatal shooting of legendary Bay Area football coach

"The attorney for the man accused of fatally shooting legendary Oakland football coach John Beam raised questions Wednesday about her client's mental fitness to stand trial, casting fresh uncertainty on a prosecution that has garnered national attention. The public defender's concerns effectively pause the criminal case against Cedric Irving Jr. while psychologists evaluate whether or not he is mentally competent to be prosecuted."

"If it is determined that he is not, Irving could be sent to a state hospital for treatment, with the goal of restoring his ability to understand court proceedings. The move casts a fresh spotlight on Irving's mental well-being, after he initially told investigators after his arrest that Beam had placed witchcraft on him sometime before the shooting. The statement later led Alameda County Chief Public Defender Brendon Woods to say the statement suggests serious mental health problems may play a significant role in this case."

"The matter of Irving's mental competency pertains solely to whether or not he understands court proceedings and can aid in his own defense. It is a completely separate legal matter from his mental state at the time of the killing, meaning it has no bearing on whether or not his attorneys could seek an insanity defense at trial. Irving's public defender, Sydney Levin, said during a hearing Wednesday there was substantial evidence that her client was not competent."

Cedric Irving Jr.'s criminal case for the fatal shooting of Oakland coach John Beam has been paused while psychologists assess his mental competency to stand trial. If found incompetent, Irving could be sent to a state hospital for treatment aimed at restoring his ability to understand court proceedings and assist in his defense. Irving initially told investigators that Beam placed witchcraft on him before the shooting, prompting concerns about serious mental health issues. Competency to stand trial is distinct from mental state at the time of the killing and does not determine the viability of an insanity defense. A judge ordered two psychological evaluations to be completed by the next court date.

Read at www.mercurynews.com