
"While the jobs may be welcome, it's worth considering the possibility that long-term single-industry investments could put people's mental health at risk. Put another way, a boom in manufacturing may be good only for some. What is seldom mentioned when red ribbons are being cut is what happens when the boom gives way to the inevitable bust, and the most vulnerable workers—usually, those who are younger and less educated—are told to go home."
"Among experienced workers hired into oil, the boom-bust cycle appears to have benefited only early entrants while leaving most later entrants stranded... workers hired into oil in later years are more likely to lose employment during the bust and are employed an average 20-40 percent fewer months per year... This negative employment shock"
Economic booms from large factories, data centers, and energy projects are often celebrated for job creation, but concentrated single-industry investment poses significant mental health risks. Research demonstrates that boom-bust cycles disproportionately harm vulnerable workers, particularly younger and less-educated employees. A University of Connecticut study comparing Brazilian oil and gas workers to those in stable industries during 2006-2014 found that early entrants with higher education weathered economic volatility better than later hires with less education. Later workers faced higher unemployment during downturns and worked 20-40 percent fewer months annually. The unequal distribution of benefits means that while some prosper, the most vulnerable face severe economic shocks and psychological consequences when industries inevitably decline.
#economic-boom-bust-cycles #mental-health-impacts #single-industry-economies #worker-vulnerability #employment-inequality
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]