The BBC's editing error was serious, but the response is way out of proportion | Margaret Sullivan

"During the editing, two clips of the president speaking to his riled-up crowd of followers in Washington were juxtaposed, even though there was nearly an hour between the two. The edited version could have made viewers believe Trump had made an unmistakable call for violence at the US Capitol that day. He did make inflammatory statements, of course, and he does bear significant responsibility for the riot at the Capitol that day, but he skirted the direct instruction that the film suggested."

"You can't be in the news business and avoid mistakes. That's why responsible media organizations correct their errors and acknowledge them to the public. It's why newsroom leaders take steps, internally, to repair broken processes. It's why they sometimes go so far as to apologize or take stories down. Some mistakes, of course, are worse than others. A misspelled name is one thing. Sustained coverage that is misleading or false is quite another. And there are plenty of gradations between those two poles."

An editing error in a BBC documentary juxtaposed two clips of Donald Trump that were nearly an hour apart, creating the impression of a direct call for violence at the US Capitol. Trump made inflammatory remarks and bears significant responsibility for the January 6 riot, but he did not issue the unmistakable instruction implied by the edited sequence. The mistake was serious and not fully acknowledged or corrected promptly. Some internal examination and external acknowledgment have occurred. The subsequent response has been disproportionate, including threats of a $1bn lawsuit, accusations of "fake news", and the resignations of two senior BBC executives.

Read at www.theguardian.com