Why Paul Scholes has it wrong, Michael Carrick is quietly completing his Man Utd mission

"When appointed back in January, Ineos set Carrick a Champions League target, something that is still well within United's own hands, facing the three main rivals in the coming six games. Victory in four of the next six would probably be enough to secure a top-five place; therefore, seeing Carrick achieve his target and something that seemed impossible two months ago."

"Carrick was only appointed as interim, not with a view to being permanent, and not to win every game this season, so criticism for six wins in eight is ridiculous. United are in a much better place now compared to pre-Carrick, and if he secures his target, then he might yet deserve a permanent chance."

"But ultimately, it comes across as jealousy, and that club legends don't want Carrick to succeed. Carrick has a lot of questions to answer in order to make himself the man appointed on a permanent basis."

Following Manchester United's 2-1 loss to Newcastle, Paul Scholes criticized Michael Carrick's management, but such criticism is unwarranted given Carrick's actual mandate. Carrick was appointed interim manager in January with a specific target of securing Champions League qualification, a goal still achievable through the remaining fixtures. With six wins in eight matches, Carrick has already improved United's position significantly from where the club stood before his appointment. Winning four of the next six games would likely secure a top-five finish and fulfill his objective. Since Carrick was never tasked with winning every game this season, judging him harshly for individual defeats is unreasonable. His performance should determine whether he receives a permanent contract.

Read at www.unitedinfocus.com