The article discusses the controversy surrounding Pete Rose's potential Hall of Fame induction, highlighting a division among fans on whether he deserves recognition despite his betting violations. It argues that major figures who have committed similar ethical breaches, including Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens, may also be deserving of a retrospective acknowledgment. The author suggests that a new wing dedicated to players with problematic histories could validate their contributions while addressing their indiscretions, emphasizing that character and integrity are core to the discussions of their legacies.
Rather than stew over whether Pete Rose and "Shoeless" Joe Jackson should be admitted, the Baseball Hall of Fame should open a special wing for miscreants.
I understand that he violated the rules and bet while a player/manager, but his numbers...had nothing to do with bets.
On the field a great player and fun to watch. Off the field bad news. His character a complete disaster.
Rose was an exceptional player. But character and certain violations matter, otherwise there's no point in trying to protect the integrity of the game.
Collection
[
|
...
]