The article explores the contentious debate surrounding Pete Rose's potential induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame, drawing parallels between his controversial character and that of Donald Trump. It questions what the Hall represents in contemporary society, echoing concerns about morality and the acceptance of bad behavior, particularly regarding male athletes in positions of power. The author reflects on both figures as products of a troubling cultural climate that tolerates transgressions, thereby raising crucial questions about the standards of conduct expected from public icons and the implications of their legacies.
The real question is: What does the Hall of Fame stand for? In our moment, Pete Rose has become a sports surrogate for Donald Trump.
Rose and Trump, both products of the same toxic all-American climate, reveal how bad behavior toward women was often excused in their era.
Collection
[
|
...
]