"In theory, it doesn't have to be very different. MLB.tv is still MLB.tv for out-of-market folks like me, though this may offer you a cheaper monthly option than A) buying all teams through MLB.tv or B) whatever FanDuel direct-to-consumer option previously existed, which of course bundled a bunch of non-Braves stuff too. It won't have the FanDuel branding, which I guess could be a plus?"
"Quickly piggybacking on yesterday's news, the question is simple. What's your excitement level? In theory, it doesn't have to be very different. MLB.tv is still MLB.tv for out-of-market folks like me, though this may offer you a cheaper monthly option than A) buying all teams through MLB.tv or B) whatever FanDuel direct-to-consumer option previously existed, which of course bundled a bunch of non-Braves stuff too."
New Braves streaming option may offer a cheaper monthly alternative for some viewers while MLB.tv remains the out-of-market service. Fans who previously relied on FanDuel's direct-to-consumer bundle could benefit from lower cost or more focused Braves access without FanDuel branding. Immediate Braves-specific programming is likely limited, since operational launch must occur within about a month to cover Spring Training. Out-of-market viewers' experience remains largely the same. The new service could evolve to include more Braves-relevant programming over time, but short-term priorities center on establishing reliable streaming for games and preseason coverage.
Read at Battery Power
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]