20mph limits and low-traffic neighbourhoods have proven effective in saving lives and preventing road injuries. Media portrayals often misrepresent these policies as unpopular or detrimental to drivers. Highway authorities must prioritize road safety, particularly for vulnerable populations, while councils have health-related obligations. Repealing 20mph zones could lead to increased accidents, as supported by clear evidence. Those in decision-making roles face potential liability for negative outcomes resulting from repealing these measures. Additionally, adopting a lower national speed limit can further enhance road safety and efficiency.
The failure to report impartially is a distortion of the truth that is misleading the public and politicians, and leading to pressure to revoke these life-saving measures.
The science and evidence are totally clear: revocation of 20mph limits or LTNs will lead to crashes, injuries and deaths.
Councillors and their advisers who pursue such actions risk being held personally liable for the harm that ensues.
There are even greater benefits to be had from a lower national speed limit.
Collection
[
|
...
]