I had a front row seat at the Blur v Oasis frenzy here's what a new play gets spot on and bafflingly wrong
Briefly

I had a front row seat at the Blur v Oasis frenzy  here's what a new play gets spot on and bafflingly wrong
"At this point, it's Israel/Palestine. Rangers/Celtic. No one remembers how it got started. All they know is, I like this team and I don't like that team.' The whole country's gone fucking mad. It's what happens in a civil war—everyone starts thinking with the blood."
"Musical considerations inevitably take second place to sales figures, as the brief, superficial friendship between the two groups curdles into a poisonous loathing, mostly on the Oasis side. And, ironically, the band that has a thoroughly uncomplicated relationship with fame and success ends up losing out to a quartet whose victory instantly fills them with angst and emptiness."
"What this new work most vividly deals in, though, is the eternal British fixation with class, which the Blur-Oasis clash was steeped in, something proved by a skip through the mountain of press coverage. As well as comparisons with the Beatles and Rolling Stones, this subtext was everywhere."
The Battle is a new play by John Niven that dramatizes the intense rivalry between Blur and Oasis during the 1990s Britpop era. The play depicts how two bands competed for chart dominance and cultural supremacy, with their conflict escalating from musical competition into bitter personal animosity. Musical considerations become secondary to sales figures and commercial success. Ironically, Oasis, the band more comfortable with fame, loses to Blur, whose victory brings them anxiety rather than satisfaction. The play emphasizes how British class divisions underpinned the rivalry, with press coverage framing it as working-class heroes versus art-school trendies, echoing historical comparisons to the Beatles and Rolling Stones.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]