"“I think he's very dangerous. Dangerous because I don't know what his north star is. I don't know what his values are. He's loved in this country. Well, that just shows you how stupid a lot of people in this country really are, Pollard continued. They don't seem to understand that empires like the United States have permanent interests, not permanent friendships.”"
"“Ask yourself a question, why is it that this administration has categorically refused to allow us to decisively beat any of our enemies, whether it's Hamas, the Houthis, Hezbollah, or even Iran? Why? Because they don't want us to win anything decisively. He protested, You have a guy like Trump who doesn't really know much about anything that's going on in this region except maybe the price of real estate, and he's dependent on people like Jared Kushner or Steve Witkoff.”"
"“I call Tweedledum and Tweedledee, that are only interested in one thing, and that's their bank account. It's as simple as that. This is not a man that you can trust. Asked, Do you think Donald Trump is anti-Semitic? Pollard replied, No, I don't think he's anti-Semitic at all. I think he's pro-money. That's all.”"
"“Pollard also predicted that the U.S.-Israel alliance would be finished by the next election. This alliance is finished. The next election, we will have a very bad choice between bad and worse, he said. Certainly on the left with the Democrats, we will not have any friends there. As far as the right is concerned, I feel that it'll take a miracle to have reasonable people on that ticket.”"
Jonathan Pollard criticized President Donald Trump and Jared Kushner, saying Trump lacks a clear guiding purpose and values. Pollard argued that U.S. policy toward Israel and regional conflicts prevents decisive victories against enemies such as Hamas, the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Iran. He claimed Trump relies on advisers focused on personal financial interests rather than regional strategy. Pollard said Trump is not anti-Semitic, but is pro-money. He predicted the U.S.-Israel alliance would end by the next election, describing the upcoming choice as between bad and worse and suggesting limited prospects for reasonable leadership on either side.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]