Yvette Cooper wrote Palestine Action article despite CPS warning it could affect trial

"It can be revealed that prosecutors warned it could prejudice criminal proceedings against six activists from the group, it can be revealed. The then-home secretary wrote the column justifying Palestine Action's proscription even though the Crown Prosecution Service advised it might unfairly impact a trial concerning a 2024 break-in at an Israeli arms manufacturer's factory. After a retrial, four of the defendants were convicted last week in relation to the raid on the Elbit Systems UK site near Bristol."

"Defence lawyers sought to halt the proceedings for alleged abuse of process, claiming Cooper's column for the Observer was an egregious example of contemptuous reporting which directly interferes with the court process. The article, on 17 August, said that charges against Palestine Action activists included a terrorism connection and also referred to violence, intimidation and disturbing information about future attacks."

"In written submissions arguing that a fair trial would be impossible, the defence lawyers said the article was dripping in innuendo. In one breath, she is saying that many important details cannot yet be publicly reported; in another, she is reporting some of those very details herself. In a pre-trial ruling last November, Mr Justice Johnson said: It is to be taken that the home secretary was specifically advised that going ahead with the article might prejudice these proceedings, and that she went ahead anyway."

"The CPS made representations to the home secretary about the risk of prejudice. It follows that the home secretary took the action that she did, and made the public statements that she did, in the knowledge that these proceedings were extant and that there might well be"

A home secretary published a newspaper column about Palestine Action despite prosecutors warning it could prejudice criminal proceedings involving six activists. The Crown Prosecution Service advised that the column might unfairly impact a trial connected to a 2024 break-in at an Israeli arms manufacturer’s factory. After a retrial, four defendants were convicted regarding the raid on the Elbit Systems UK site near Bristol. Defense lawyers for four activists sought to halt the proceedings, alleging abuse of process and contemptuous reporting that directly interfered with the court process. Written submissions claimed the column contained innuendo and reported details while also suggesting some information could not yet be publicly reported. A pre-trial ruling stated the home secretary was specifically advised that proceeding with the article might prejudice the proceedings and went ahead anyway.

Read at www.theguardian.com