What is Lost When Legal Grammar Runs Without Judgment? | HackerNoon
Briefly

Law increasingly acts as an interface where authority is compiled. Effective legal drafting should ensure that each binding clause clearly identifies an accountable actor. Obligations must be articulated in an active voice with enforceable triggers, creating a visible authority chain from clause to approver. Additionally, modals such as "must," "should," and "may" must follow explicit governing rules. The ability for a reader to audit authorship without requiring external documentation is crucial. Failing this makes syntax valid but leaves legality hollow.
The law functions as an interface where authority is compiled rather than issued, emphasizing the importance of accountability in legal drafting.
Legal drafting requires that each binding clause identifies an accountable participant, ensuring clarity and enforceability of obligations and authority.
Read at Hackernoon
[
|
]