"The DOJ's filing challenges a Massachusetts law restricting firearm sales, claiming it violates the Second Amendment. It argues that 'common use' should reflect what citizens actually carry."
"The DOJ acknowledges that while nuclear weapons are highly unusual, if they became popular, they could be legally permissible. This raises concerns about what arms might be allowed."
The DOJ's legal filings challenge state assault weapon bans, asserting that past court decisions incorrectly defined 'common use' weapons. The DOJ contends that such definitions should reflect customary practices of citizens. This argument raises concerns about the legality of unusual arms, suggesting that if weapons like nuclear arms or grenade launchers became widely used, they could be deemed permissible. The DOJ acknowledges the implausibility of citizens carrying nuclear weapons but does not entirely dismiss the possibility, prompting questions about future legal interpretations of weapon ownership.
Read at LGBTQ Nation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]