
"Trump's DOJ has taken an extreme pro-gun-rights view of the Second Amendment, making clear that the public has a constitutional right to access a broad range of weapons for self-defense. Their position suggests that any arm in 'common use' by law-abiding citizens cannot be regulated, regardless of its danger or suitability for lawful self-defense."
"The DOJ's logic implies that if nuclear weapons were to become popular among civilians, they could be constitutionally entitled to acquire and possess them. This reasoning extends to other dangerous arms, such as grenade launchers or bazookas, raising significant concerns about public safety."
Trump's Department of Justice has adopted an extreme pro-gun-rights interpretation of the Second Amendment, asserting that any weapon in 'common use' for self-defense cannot be regulated. This includes a controversial stance on nuclear weapons, where the DOJ implies that if such weapons became popular, they could be constitutionally protected. The DOJ does not currently argue that nuclear weapons are protected, but their reasoning raises concerns about public safety and the potential for dangerous arms to be legally accessible to civilians.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]