"After months of bluster, the administration appeared ready to admit what judges across the ideological spectrum had already made clear - the orders weren't going to survive constitutional muster. It was, by any measure, a remarkable concession."
"By 10 a.m. Tuesday morning, the same DOJ officials who filed to get out of the case were back with a completely different litigation strategy. In an email to the four firms fighting the administration - Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie, and Susman Godfrey - a department official reportedly apologized for the short notice and said the government would file a motion to withdraw its own voluntary dismissal."
"The firms were asked to let DOJ know within a half hour whether they planned to oppose the administration's attempt to un-ring the bell. Thirty minutes seems like a short turn around to make a major litigation decision."
The U.S. Department of Justice initially filed a voluntary dismissal request in cases challenging Trump's executive orders targeting major law firms, signaling an apparent concession after judges across the ideological spectrum indicated the orders lacked constitutional merit. However, within 24 hours, the administration abruptly reversed this decision and announced plans to renew its defense of the same executive orders. DOJ officials contacted the four defending firms—Jenner & Block, WilmerHale, Perkins Coie, and Susman Godfrey—requesting they respond within 30 minutes regarding their opposition to withdrawing the dismissal. This dramatic reversal raises questions about the administration's litigation strategy and the reasoning behind the sudden policy shift.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]