Perkins Coie Fires Lawyer Over This Charlie Kirk Post - Above the Law
Briefly

Perkins Coie Fires Lawyer Over This Charlie Kirk Post - Above the Law
"If an attorney chooses to publicly air controversial opinions, they can expect to get fired. Law firms are a business first, and if their public-facing professionals make statements that alienate clients or create the whiff of a hostile work environment, the firm can cut ties to protect its business. It's not a free speech thing, it's just business. That said, firing someone over their remarks is always a question of "coulda and shoulda.""
"When an incoming Winston & Strawn associate called the October 7 Hamas attacks "necessary," the firm quickly revoked that offer. When Foley & Lardner fired a new associate months later for calling out the human rights crisis brought on by the Israeli government's response, the move smacked of overreaction... and possible discrimination. Which is all to say that the death of Charlie Kirk presents law firms with new opportunities to struggle with this line."
"There are certainly people out there celebrating the right-wing activist's death on social media. However, many, many more are "celebrating" his death only in the twisted minds of the right-wing political correctness police. Which is to say they are NOT celebrating at all - indeed, they're openly denouncing political violence - but they're using this moment to callously "quote things Kirk actually said.""
Law firms prioritize business interests and will sever ties with lawyers whose public statements alienate clients or suggest a hostile workplace. Employers commonly treat controversial public speech as a business risk rather than a free-speech issue. A revoked offer followed an associate calling the October 7 Hamas attacks "necessary," and a later firing over criticism of Israel's response raised concerns about overreaction and potential discrimination. The death of Charlie Kirk has intensified social-media responses, including selective quoting and political pressure from elected officials seeking funding cuts or systematic firings, complicating firm employment decisions.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]