"Stuckey wrote that the publication's demand for users' ChatGPT logs, which it asked to review as part of its copyright infringement lawsuit, "disregards long-standing privacy protections" and "breaks with common-sense security practices." "Journalism has historically played a critical role in defending people's right to privacy throughout the world," Stuckey wrote. "However, this demand from the New York Times does not live up to that legacy, and we're asking the court to reject it.""
"In a November 7 order, Magistrate Judge Ona Wang wrote that it was "appropriate" for OpenAI to produce the 20 million ChatGPT logs that lawyers for The New York Times had requested as part of their discovery process. She said that OpenAI hadn't adequately explained why the privacy of ChatGPT users was not already protected, given the stringent measures required for lawyers and experts to review the discovery material in the case."
OpenAI criticized The New York Times' request for 20 million ChatGPT user logs as an invasion of user privacy and a departure from common-sense security practices. OpenAI's chief information security officer called the demand a disregard of long-standing privacy protections and urged the court to reject it, invoking journalism's role in defending privacy. A federal magistrate judge, Ona Wang, ordered production of the 20 million logs on November 7 and found OpenAI had not shown that existing protective orders and its de-identification measures sufficiently protected user privacy. OpenAI is seeking reconsideration of that order.
Read at Business Insider
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]