"The narrative that led to their prosecution in the Eastern District of New York on forced labor charges began somewhere else entirely, a highly questionable Netflix documentary, whose editors were more interested in sensationalization than accuracy."
"Editors of the film used what is known in the industry as frankenbiting, splicing together pieces of Daedone's interviews to create statements she never actually made in that form."
"When serious questions emerged about its accuracy, including journal entries prosecutors had claimed were written in 2015 but were actually created years later for the film, the government quietly abandoned that evidence rather than defend it."
"Even more troubling, an FBI agent involved in the criminal investigation appeared in the documentary itself."
The prosecution of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz was influenced by a questionable Netflix documentary that used frankenbiting to misrepresent statements. The trial relied on selectively edited fragments of Daedone's words, omitting crucial context. Evidence for the indictment stemmed from the documentary, which faced accuracy challenges. The government abandoned questionable evidence instead of defending it. An FBI agent's involvement in the documentary raised concerns, and Netflix collaborated with prosecutors to block subpoenas aimed at uncovering the relationship between filmmakers and investigators, undermining the justice system's integrity.
Read at www.amny.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]