"When officials test whether lawyers who challenge authority can be excluded from places where law operates, our democratic guardrails weaken. Restrictions on mobility fit squarely within a broader pattern of how authority responds to legal opposition."
"Dolan defended the practice as a business decision, but the use of surveillance methods to track and exclude legal adversaries carries an unmistakable authoritarian impulse."
"When authority public or private decides which lawyers may enter or be denied access to spaces where professional or personal life unfolds, it becomes a dangerous tool of intimidation."
Orders limiting lawyers' access to venues where disputes with the government are resolved threaten democratic integrity. Such restrictions reflect a broader trend of authority suppressing legal opposition. A notable instance occurred in 2022 when James Dolan used facial recognition to exclude lawyers from events based on their professional affiliations. This practice, defended as a business decision, reveals an authoritarian tendency. The implications of restricting legal professionals' mobility extend beyond individual cases, signaling a dangerous erosion of democratic freedoms and intimidation against those challenging authority.
Read at www.amny.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]