New Utah Law Lets Students Skip Content They Don't Believe In. And You Thought Teaching Con Law Was Bad Before... - Above the Law
Briefly

New Utah Law Lets Students Skip Content They Don't Believe In. And You Thought Teaching Con Law Was Bad Before... - Above the Law
"A new state law offers these students a unique protection: If something in a class conflicts with their strongly held religious or personal beliefs, students can ask their professor for an alternative assignment or exam. And as long as their request doesn't change the fundamental nature of the course, the professor is now required by law to allow the student to opt out."
"Michael J. Petersen, a Republican state representative from Logan, said the idea for the bill came after his daughter was assigned to write a letter to a legislator in support of LGBTQ+ rights as part of a master's degree program at an out-of-state college. The assignment was in conflict with her beliefs, so she called her dad for help."
"To the degree that the law prevents students from being forced to materially advocate for something that is against their will (i.e., sending a letter of support to a senator), I think the law is fair game. But there is a risk of sloping toward refusing engagement with any unsavory ideas and forcing professors to make students comf"
Stare decisis has been treated with less force after major constitutional developments. Bruen in 2022 reduced reliance on prior precedent, and internal consistency among rulings has been questioned. Trump v. United States made it harder to distinguish a president from a king, while Kennedy v. Bremerton blurred the line between church and state. A new Utah law creates an opt-out mechanism for students whose religious or personal beliefs conflict with class content. Students may request alternative assignments or exams, and professors must allow opt-outs if the request does not change the fundamental nature of the course. The law is framed as protecting students from being compelled to materially advocate against their will, while raising concerns about refusing engagement with ideas deemed unsavory.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]