"There was clearly someone on the mobile phone talking to Jakstys. He then removed his mobile phone from his inner jacket pocket. In my judgement, from what occurred in court, it is clear that call was made, connected to his smart glasses, and continued during his evidence until his mobile phone was removed from him."
"Not only have I held that Jakstys was untruthful in denying his use of the smart glasses and his calls to abra kadabra, but the effect of this is that his evidence is unreliable and untruthful."
"The court noticed he 'seemed to pause quite a bit' before answering questions, and that 'interference' was heard coming from around the witness. The judge later found that he had been 'assisted or coached in his replies to questions put to him during cross examination' during the January trial."
During a property dispute trial, Judge Raquel Agnello KC observed a witness, Laimonas Jakstys, exhibiting suspicious behavior including frequent pauses before answering questions and audible interference near him. When court staff noticed these irregularities, Jakstys was instructed to remove his smart glasses. Subsequently, his mobile phone broadcast a voice, which he attributed to ChatGPT. Investigation revealed multiple calls from Jakstys' phone to a contact named 'abra kadabra,' whom he claimed was a taxi driver. The judge concluded that Jakstys had been coached during cross-examination through his smart glasses connected to his phone. She ruled his evidence unreliable and untruthful, finding he had deliberately lied about using the glasses and making the calls.
Read at www.bbc.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]