"Eight legal experts interviewed for this article said the Comey indictment fails to provide evidence that the former FBI director intended his social media message as a genuine threat to the president. Under court rules, prosecutors are obligated to shape the language of their charges to conform with the current state of the law."
"'It not only should be dismissed outright, it should also mean sanctions for any lawyer who signed off on it,' Franks said. 'I cannot think of any possible evidence that would make this particular phrase a threat.'"
Every first Monday of the month, a comprehensive summary of legal ethics headlines is provided, along with reading recommendations, pop culture insights, trivia, job postings, and events. This week features discussions on the Comey indictment and its legal implications, highlighting the necessity for evidence of intent in legal charges. Additionally, upcoming speaking engagements and podcasts on ethical AI usage in mediation and arbitration are announced, emphasizing the evolving landscape of legal ethics in contemporary practice.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]