Lawsuit challenges California's ban on less-lethal pepperball weapons

"A newly filed lawsuit in San Diego federal court is challenging the constitutionality of California laws that prohibit state residents from buying and owning weapons that fire pepper projectiles, arguing that banning the less-lethal weapons violates the Second Amendment. Such weapons are known as pepper projectile launchers and typically resemble a pistol or rifle, using CO cartridges to fire pepperballs, which are about the size of paintballs and are filled with a chemical irritant powder designed to temporarily incapacitate the person being shot."

"Pepper projectile launchers are a commonly-used arm that many Americans choose as a non-lethal alternative to firearms, the lawsuit argues. California doesn't just deny its citizens this choice; it criminalizes the act of selling or possessing such an arm. This inexplicable ban violates the Second Amendment. The lawsuit argues that a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court decision from 2016 held that less-lethal stun guns qualify as arms protected by the Second Amendment."

"The non-lethal arms at issue here are similarly protected, the lawsuit contends. RELATED: Federal judge reverses himself, rules that California's ban on billy clubs is unconstitutional The named plaintiffs in the suit are a woman who lives in San Diego County, a man who lives in Orange County and Byrna Technologies, described in the complaint as the manufacturer and seller of the most popular pepper projectile launchers in the nation. Byrna's website informs would-be buyers that it does not ship its pepperballs to California."

California law prohibits residents from buying or owning weapons that fire pepper projectiles by classifying the projectiles as tear gas and the launchers as tear gas weapons. Pepper projectile launchers resemble pistols or rifles and use CO cartridges to fire pepperballs filled with chemical irritant powder designed to temporarily incapacitate targets. Plaintiffs include two California residents and Byrna Technologies, a manufacturer that does not ship pepperballs to California. The lawsuit contends the ban criminalizes non-lethal self-defense options and violates the Second Amendment by drawing parallels to a 2016 Supreme Court ruling protecting less-lethal stun guns.

Read at www.sandiegouniontribune.com