The Dakota Access Pipeline trial, beginning this week, features Energy Transfers suing Greenpeace for $300 million, alleging support for unlawful protests against the pipeline construction. The company claims Greenpeace spread misinformation about the pipeline's environmental impact, associating the organization with property damage and trespassing. Greenpeace argues that the lawsuit is a massive SLAPP case threatening free speech and grassroots activism, particularly as it misrepresents the Indigenous-led protests against the pipeline that began nearly a decade ago. The potential financial repercussions could dismantle the organization, endangering its long-standing environmental work.
The impending trial regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline could redefine the legal landscape for environmental protests and the future viability of Greenpeace.
Energy Transfers alleges that Greenpeace's support of protests led to unlawful actions and misinformation that harmed the company and endangered the pipeline.
If we lose, Greenpeace USA could face financial ruin, ending over 50 years of environmental activism,” underscoring the lawsuit's significant implications for the organization.
This lawsuit is among the largest SLAPP suits aimed at quelling civic engagement, raising questions about freedom of speech and advocacy.
Collection
[
|
...
]