Judge Julien Xavier Neals of the District of New Jersey retracted his June 30 order in the CorMedix lawsuit due to incorrect case citations identified by opposing lawyers. While no outright fake cases appeared, significant inaccuracies and misquotes were discovered. For instance, quotes attributed to Dang v. Amarin Corp. and an Intelligroup case were misquoted. Notably, a citation for Stichting Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek v. Verizon incorrectly labeled it as a Southern District of New York case, despite it belonging to New Jersey.
In a recent ruling, Judge Julien Xavier Neals of the District of New Jersey withdrew his order due to inaccurate case citations after being alerted by lawyers.
Lawyers have highlighted pervasive inaccuracies in Judge Neals' CorMedix opinion, showcasing mistakes and misquotes rather than outright fake cases or incorrect legal conclusions.
Errors included misquoted cases, such as the improper citation of Dang v. Amarin Corp. regarding executives' behavior and incorrect references to the Intelligroup case.
Controversially, the citation of Stichting Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek v. Verizon was mistakenly referenced as a Southern District of New York case when it originated from New Jersey.
Collection
[
|
...
]