"Perhaps because the interview remains widely available on YouTube, Haley has not publicly disputed the facts alleged in the complaint, which go far beyond the aluminum can comparison. She claimed that sex with Matt was "painful," "impossible," and left her "in tears." She added that the couple tried "medical and therapeutic intervention," and that the physical challenges made their sexual relationship "unhealthy" and were a major factor contributing to the couple's subsequent divorce."
"That harm is firmly anchored in a branch of privacy law that has long been recognized, but has fallen into disfavor in recent years. The law of personal injury, while primarily concerned with physical injuries, also protects certain dignitary interests, including reputation (the law of defamation), emotional well-being, and four distinct categories of privacy. Only one of these is alleged to apply in this case: public disclosure of private facts."
Matt Kalil filed a lawsuit alleging that Haley Kalil publicly disclosed private sexual facts about him during a 12-minute livestream interview with Marlon Lundgren Garcia. Haley reportedly compared his penis to 'two Coke cans, maybe even a third,' and said sex with him was 'painful,' 'impossible,' and left her 'in tears.' She said the couple pursued 'medical and therapeutic intervention' and that physical challenges made their sexual relationship 'unhealthy' and contributed to their divorce. Millions viewed the livestream, spreading the intimate details widely and amplifying alleged harm. The claim invokes the privacy tort of public disclosure of private facts under personal injury law.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]