"Most trans people do not see gender-critical women as horrible bigots but do feel that their stance, regardless of intention, does serve to discriminate against us. By attempting to restrict us from spaces/activities we have used for decades without issue does result in discrimination and marginalises us from society. The other issues they present are highly complicated, so shouldn't be reduced to a basic good/bad stance."
"Any blanket approach to medical care, whether it is cessation or unrestricted to what should be tailored medicine will cause considerable suffering. The same goes for sport; there is little recorded evidence of danger to women when including trans women, nor would this danger explain enthusiastic bans in non-contact sports such as swimming, running or, of all things, chess. As for genetics, while it may be the case that chromosomes can't be altered, sex characteristics, however, certainly can."
Most trans people do not view gender-critical women as inherently bigoted but recognize that gender-critical positions can discriminate against trans people. Restricting trans people from longstanding spaces and activities marginalizes them and constitutes discrimination. Complex matters such as medical care and sport require nuanced, evidence-based approaches rather than simplistic good/bad framing. Blanket medical policies or unrestricted approaches risk causing considerable suffering instead of providing tailored treatment. Evidence of danger to women from including trans women in many sports is limited, and bans in non-contact activities lack clear justification. Social policy based solely on chromosomes may be prejudiced without substantial supporting evidence. Discourse should calm, and people should not face arrest, job loss, or exclusion for their views or identities.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]