"California law strongly protects the health and wellbeing of transgender and nonbinary school children. As such, it prohibits school districts in the state from forcing school employees to "out" queer students to their parents when the students are open about their sexuality or gender identity at school, but not at home."
"The effect of the decision is that California school districts can now force school personnel to disclose the sexual orientation or gender identity of students to their parents without the student's consent, potentially putting LGBTIQ+ youth without parental support at great risk."
"Justice Elena Kagan blasted the decision, questioning the supermajority's sincerity and integrity: "The court is impatient: It already knows what it thinks, and insists on getting everything over quickly.""
California law protects transgender and nonbinary students by prohibiting schools from forcing employees to disclose students' sexual orientation or gender identity to parents without consent. The Supreme Court's Republican supermajority recently struck down this protection using its expedited shadow docket process. This decision allows California school districts to compel personnel to reveal student information to parents, potentially endangering LGBTIQ+ youth without supportive families. The Court's supermajority, all raised Catholic, based their decision on parental and religious rights. Conservative Catholic parents and attorneys brought the case, seeking to advance conservative Judeo-Christian values. Justice Kagan criticized the decision, arguing the Court prioritized speed over careful deliberation.
#lgbtiq-student-rights #supreme-court-decision #parental-disclosure-laws #religious-liberty #school-privacy-protections
Read at San Francisco Bay Times
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]