Poll: Which Team Had The Best Offseason?
Briefly

Poll: Which Team Had The Best Offseason?
"The offseason has more or less come to a close at this point. While a handful of players remain available in free agency and there's always a chance of a surprise trade or two throughout Spring Training, the vast majority of the heavy lifting has been done. As Spring Training begins, it's worth checking in on what teams around the league did this winter to see which club had the strongest offseason. A look at a few of the candidates:"
"The Dodgers' offseason hasn't been an exceptionally busy one, but the few moves they wound up making could prove to be the most impactful of any team this winter. They kicked off their offseason by poaching star closer away from the Mets, but their biggest splash was the addition of Tucker to their outfield. Diaz and Tucker are both All-Stars with among the highest ceilings in the game at their respective positions."
"Plenty of teams had offseasons worthy of praise aside from the five listed above. The Tigers managed to snag arguably the top pitcher available in lefty Framber Valdez on a short-term deal while also reuniting with future Hall of Famer and Detroit legend Justin Verlander, though failing to upgrade the lineup is surely disappointing for fans hoping to see the team make the most of Tarik Skubal's likely last year in town."
The offseason is largely complete as Spring Training begins, with only a few free agents and possible surprise trades remaining. Several teams stand out for their winter activity, including the Baltimore Orioles, Chicago Cubs, Los Angeles Dodgers, New York Mets, and Toronto Blue Jays. The Dodgers made limited but high-impact additions, acquiring Diaz and Tucker to address bullpen and outfield weaknesses while re-signing role players and keeping payroll flexibility. Other clubs made notable moves: the Tigers added Framber Valdez and reunited with Justin Verlander on short-term deals, and the Red Sox were active in trades and free agency.
Read at MLB Trade Rumors
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]