Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 13: Former USPTO Patent Examiner Settles Conflict Allegations; EU Parliament Endorses EUIPO Register of Works Used to Train AI; U.S.-Based Operations Become Discretionary Denial Factor at PTAB
Briefly

Other Barks & Bites for Friday, March 13: Former USPTO Patent Examiner Settles Conflict Allegations; EU Parliament Endorses EUIPO Register of Works Used to Train AI; U.S.-Based Operations Become Discretionary Denial Factor at PTAB
"On Wednesday, March 11, the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ) announced that Christine Tu, a former patent examiner at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), agreed to pay $122,480 to resolve allegations that she violated agency conflict of interest rules by working substantially on one patent application filed by a company in which Tu had a disqualifying financial interest."
Christine Tu, a former USPTO patent examiner, agreed to pay $122,480 to resolve conflict of interest allegations. Tu violated agency rules by working substantially on a patent application filed by a company in which she held a disqualifying financial interest. This settlement represents the second conflict of interest case resolved by the Department of Justice involving USPTO examiners within two weeks. The case highlights ongoing concerns about ethical compliance and proper recusal procedures within the patent examination process. Additional developments include Sandoz establishing a biosimilar unit, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce reporting declining IP protections in European nations, USPTO policy changes regarding U.S.-based operations, EU copyright protections for AI training data, Albania's accession to the Riyadh Design Law Treaty, and a Fifth Circuit trademark ruling.
[
|
]