Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work | TechCrunch

"“if a submission contains incontrovertible evidence that the authors did not check the results of LLM generation, this means we can't trust anything in the paper.”"

"That incontrovertible evidence could include things like “hallucinated references” and comments to or from the LLM, Dietterich said. If such evidence is found, a paper's authors will face “a 1-year ban from arXiv followed by the requirement that subsequent arXiv submissions must first be accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue.”"

"Note that this isn't an outright prohibition on using LLMs, but rather an insistence that, as Dietterich put it, authors take “full responsibility” for the content, “irrespective of how the contents are generated.” So if researchers copy-paste “inappropriate language, plagiarized content, biased content, errors, mistakes, incorrect references, or misleading content” directly from an LLM, then they're still responsible for it."

ArXiv is tightening rules to reduce low-quality, AI-generated scientific papers. The repository requires first-time posters to obtain an endorsement from an established author and is becoming an independent nonprofit to raise funds to address AI-generated “slop.” Thomas Dietterich announced that if a submission contains incontrovertible evidence the authors did not check LLM generation results, the work cannot be trusted. Evidence may include hallucinated references or communications with the LLM. Authors found under this standard face a one-year ban, followed by a requirement that later submissions be accepted by a reputable peer-reviewed venue. The policy does not ban LLM use, but requires full responsibility for all content regardless of how it was generated.

Read at TechCrunch