Preprint server arXiv will ban submitters of AI-generated hallucinations

"Submissions to arXiv must comply with appropriate standards of scholarly communication in form, including appropriate and carefully prepared sections, figures, tables, references, etc. General scrupulousness and care of preparation are required."

"Fake citations, unedited prompt responses, and nonsensical diagrams have all slipped past editors and peer reviewers, and it's not always clear if there are any consequences for the people responsible."

"One of the people involved in the physics and astronomy preprint server arXiv used a social media thread to announce that any inappropriate AI-produced content submitted to the server will result in a one-year ban and a permanent requirement that future publications undergo peer review before the arXiv will host them."

AI-generated low-quality content has appeared in peer-reviewed literature, including fake citations, unedited prompt outputs, and nonsensical diagrams that have passed editorial and review processes. Scientific fields are beginning to enforce rules against AI-generated problems before journal involvement. arXiv is implementing a policy that penalizes inappropriate AI-produced submissions with a one-year ban. Future publications must undergo peer review before arXiv will host them. The policy is described as stemming from arXiv moderation standards requiring submissions to meet scholarly communication norms, including carefully prepared sections, figures, tables, and references, with general scrupulousness and care in preparation.

Read at Ars Technica