Patagonia said it spent years trying to reach an agreement that would let Pattie Gonia continue work while protecting the Patagonia trademark. Patagonia officials said the efforts included multiple proposals, dialogue, and genuine efforts to avoid court. Patagonia stated it wants Pattie Gonia to have a long, successful career and make progress on issues that matter while respecting Patagonia’s intellectual property. Patagonia sought $1 in damages and legal fees, saying the case is not about financial gain or challenging identity, advocacy, protest, or creative expression. Pattie Gonia said the lawsuit shows willingness to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to grind her down. Patagonia alleged the products compete directly, confuse consumers, and that Pattie Gonia violated an agreement by seeking exclusive ownership of a PATTIE GONIA trademark for commercialization and advocacy.
"Patagonia told KQED in a statement that it spent years trying to reach an agreement "that would allow Pattie Gonia to continue their work while also protecting the Patagonia trademark." Officials said the efforts included multiple proposals, dialogue and "genuine efforts to avoid ending up in court." But the two parties have not yet reached an agreement."
""We want Pattie to have a long and successful career and make progress on issues that matter - but in a way that respects Patagonia's intellectual property," Patagonia officials wrote. Patagonia is seeking $1 in damages and legal fees. Officials wrote that it's "not about seeking financial gain" or "challenging anyone's identity or right to advocacy, protest, or creative expression.""
""The last thing we wanted was a legal fight with someone who shares our values, but we must protect our business and employees, the officials added." But Pattie Gonia said that the lawsuit makes one thing clear: the company is "willing to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars tolawsui grind me down so far that I can't continue to operate.""
"Patagonia's lawsuit states that Pattie Gonia's products "compete directly" with Patagonia's products and brand "in a way that has already confused consumers." The company wrote that "it supports advocacy and activism that promote the environment and inclusion in the outdoors." But Patagonia officials said that they "repeatedly communicated with Pattie Gonia" and in the past "reached agreement about how that advocacy work might continue in a way that would not interfere with Patagonia's brand.""
#trademark-infringement #intellectual-property #outdoor-apparel #advocacy-and-activism #consumer-confusion
Read at Kqed
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]