"The Batton plaintiffs claim that NAR is asking the court to compel them to stand aside while it proceeds with its reverse-auction Tuccori settlement that, if approved, will extinguish a significant portion of Plaintiffs' claims against NAR in this case."
"The court wrote that it would be presumptuous to treat the final approval of the settlement and resolution of all claims against Defendant Anywhere as a foregone conclusion and stay the Batton litigation."
"The Batton plaintiffs argue that a stay would prejudice them and cause delay, especially if the settlements do not gain final approval."
The Batton plaintiffs are challenging NAR's request to move forward with a settlement that could eliminate some of their claims. They previously filed motions to block settlements related to the Tuccori lawsuit, which were denied. Despite this, the court allowed their case against Anywhere Real Estate to continue. The Batton plaintiffs argue that a stay would harm their interests, especially if the settlements do not receive final approval. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for Thursday.
Read at www.housingwire.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]