After LKQ: The Boilerplate Changed; The Rejection Rate Did Not
Briefly

After LKQ: The Boilerplate Changed; The Rejection Rate Did Not
"I worked through several rejections in detail to see whether examiners are pushing into prior art that the old framework would have blocked. Some are. Aristocrat's slot-machine GUI was rejected over a structurally different primary, and TOP"
Design patent §103 rejection rates have stayed flat at roughly 1% through Hague System disposals for two years after LKQ. A comparison of about 150 pre-LKQ obviousness rejections from 2023 with about 150 post-LKQ rejections from January 2025 through April 2026 shows that examiners no longer cite Rosen or other pre-LKQ precedent. About 80% of pre-LKQ rejections cited Rosen or an equivalent case, while 0% of post-LKQ rejections did. Verbal markers tied to the Rosen primary-reference test and Durling-era “so related” language largely disappeared. New dominant phrases include “visually similar” and “overall appearance,” while LKQ is rarely cited and KSR is not cited. Nearly 90% of post-LKQ rejections cite no obviousness precedent at all.
Read at Patently-O
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]