The article discusses how the release of 28 Years Later has sparked debate regarding 28 Weeks Later's role in the franchise, particularly its narrative coherence. It highlights how the new film seemingly walks back the resolutions established earlier, including the supposed end of the rage virus, complicating 28 Weeks Later's standing. The piece notes that while 28 Weeks Later was a well-crafted film, its disconnection from the original creators adds confusion to its place among the sequels, illustrating the complexities of franchise storytelling.
As divisive reactions to 28 Years Later continue to take shape, the movie has inspired some side chat about how, exactly, we're expected to think about 28 Weeks Later, the other 28 Days Later sequel.
The 28 Years Later walk-back of its ending comes after 28 Weeks Later itself appends a clear resolution to the original movie after the fact.
Collection
[
|
...
]