"Richard I's capture on his way home from the Third Crusade is often told like a medieval adventure: the king disappears, his enemies move quickly, and his realm is left waiting. In a new study, historian Attila Bárány argues that looking closely at the politics behind the episode helps explain key choices Richard made, including why he attempted to travel through territory linked to his enemy, Duke Leopold V of Austria."
"The article's main contribution is a change in emphasis. Rather than treating Richard's capture as an almost inevitable outcome of personality and fate, Bárány asks what the episode looked like to the rulers who could benefit from it. That means shifting attention away from familiar motifs-storms, disguises, and moral lessons-and towards incentives: who gained from Richard's absence, and how could a king's return be turned into leverage?"
A close examination of politics around Richard I's return from the Third Crusade emphasizes regional incentives, rival rulers, contested routes, and shifting alliances as drivers of events. The analysis interprets Richard's choice to travel through territory linked to Duke Leopold V as shaped by diplomatic calculations and local power dynamics rather than mere personal folly or fate. Attention shifts from familiar motifs—storms, disguises, moral lessons—to practical benefits for rulers who could exploit the king's absence and leverage his return. The approach reframes the Acre quarrel as one factor among many and highlights Central European sources that clarify political incentives.
Read at Medievalists.net
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]