"Rankings are a 'double-edged sword.' They are 'helpful for students if they are used properly, but I don't think students fully comprehend rankings.' They are 'biased.' They are 'contrived.' They 'promote the same T14.' They 'create an opportunity gap.' They 'limit student choices.'"
"For law school leaders, the rankings can influence everything from student recruitment to alumni donations, and in some cases, even their own job security."
A survey from Kaplan reveals that 58 percent of law school admissions officers believe U.S. News rankings have diminished in prestige. This perception follows Yale Law's withdrawal from the rankings, which affected their credibility. Admissions officers describe rankings as biased and contrived, noting they promote a limited set of schools and create an opportunity gap for students. Despite these concerns, schools continue to engage with the rankings due to their influence on recruitment, donations, and job security for admissions staff.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]