"In a year already defined by polarization and violence, the assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University plunged higher education into crisis. The killing of one of the nation's most prominent conservative activists on a college campus has been weaponized by political factions, prompting administrative crackdowns and faculty firings. What were once familiar battles in the campus culture wars have escalated into something more dangerous: a struggle over the very conditions of inquiry, where violence, scandal and political pressure converge to erode academic freedom."
"At the center of this struggle lies a persistent illusion: that the university should provide a platform for "every perspective." Critics claim campuses suppress conservative voices or silence dissenting students, arguing institutions should resemble open marketplaces where all viewpoints compete for attention. Enticing as this rhetoric may be, the expectation is both unworkable and misguided. No university can present every possible outlook in equal measure, nor should it."
The assassination at Utah Valley University intensified polarization, prompting administrative crackdowns and faculty firings. Political factions have weaponized the killing to pressure colleges, converging violence, scandal, and political coercion to erode academic freedom. Proposed federal funding conditions would require institutions to guarantee a broad spectrum of viewpoints in each department and to abolish units accused of punishing conservative ideas. The expectation that universities must platform every perspective is impractical and counterproductive. Universities should prioritize cultivating, critiquing, and transmitting knowledge, attending to historically influential perspectives rather than equalizing all viewpoints.
Read at Inside Higher Ed | Higher Education News, Events and Jobs
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]