"I noted in your social media post that you consider my course "woke" and "DEI" or part of some "progressive left agenda" to indoctrinate your children. Just for clarification, I don't think you mean your actual children, all of whom you sent to Harvard and not to the state university at which I teach. I suspect you meant your constituents' children."
"I understand that you are concerned about the massive amount of tax dollars spent on my course. I assure you that is not the case, neither in terms of my course as a percentage of aggregate tax dollars nor even as a percentage of each individual taxpayer's overall liability. My course is small potatoes. Even if you were to look at the percentage of classes you deem "woke" versus total class offerings at my university,"
A university course has been labeled 'woke' and tied to DEI or a progressive agenda to indoctrinate students. The politician's children attended Harvard rather than the state university where the course is taught. The course constitutes a negligible portion of aggregate taxpayer spending and does not materially affect individual tax liability. Enrollment patterns have not been examined, leaving the net financial impact on the university unclear; high-demand courses can subsidize institutional finances. A 3% pay raise over eight years is noted, and conclusions are challenged absent further investigation of enrollment and budgetary data.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]