No, Higher Ed Mergers Have Never Been Strategic (column)
Briefly

No, Higher Ed Mergers Have Never Been Strategic (column)
"The vast majority of higher education mergers today are not strategic combinations of comparable institutions but absorptions of a weaker institution by a(n at least somewhat) stronger one, usually with the acquiring university eyeing a valuable, well-located piece of real estate."
"Mergers are extremely difficult, and relatively rare, because they almost always result in one institution (and all its constituents) subjugating their own needs and visibility to the other."
"It took 80 years for the institutions to marry, and three years after the merger, their separate football teams still rumbled on Saturday afternoons."
Mergers in higher education frequently involve a stronger institution absorbing a weaker one, rather than equal partnerships. Case Western Reserve University and Carnegie Mellon University are examples of historical mergers. Despite their complementary missions, the integration process is lengthy and complex, often resulting in ongoing identity struggles. The challenges of merging institutions include subjugating individual needs and visibility, raising questions about the potential for mutually beneficial outcomes in future mergers.
[
|
]