
"That position may be teetering, the most recent evidence of a troubling trend for American academia. Harvard recently dropped to No. 3 on the ranking. The schools racing up the list are not Harvard's American peers, but Chinese universities that have been steadily climbing in rankings that emphasize the volume and quality of research they produce. The reordering comes as the Trump administration has been slashing research funding to American schools that depend heavily on the federal government to pay for scientific endeavors."
"'There is a big shift coming, a bit of a new world order in global dominance of higher education and research,' said Phil Baty, chief global affairs officer for Times Higher Education, a British organization unconnected to The New York Times that produces one of the better-known world rankings of universities. Educators and experts say the shift is a problem not just for American universities, but also for the nation as a whole. 'There is a risk of the trend continuing, and potential decline,' Baty said. 'I use the word 'decline' very carefully. It's not as if U.S. schools are getting demonstrably worse, it's just the global competition: Other nations are making more rapid progress.'"
Harvard, long the most productive research university by publication-based measures, has fallen to No. 3 while Chinese universities climb global rankings that emphasize research volume and quality. The shift reflects years of changing global competition rather than an immediate drop in U.S. quality, but reductions in federal research funding under the Trump administration risk accelerating relative decline for American institutions that rely on government support. Experts warn the change could affect national research leadership and broader strategic interests. Early 2000s rankings showed seven American schools in the top ten, with only one Chinese institution represented then.
Read at Boston.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]