40 years on, did Proposition 48 protect US college sports or punish Black athletes?

"He had accepted his fate a few months earlier when standardized test results led to the decision that he would not be eligible to participate in collegiate sports his freshman year. But nothing prepared him for this. People were looking at me, Rice says. They knew I was a football player and they knew why I wasn't playing. I'm sure they were thinking,"

"Tuesday marks the 40th anniversary of Proposition 48, approved by member schools of the National Collegiate Athletic Association, which tied freshman athletic eligibility to minimum grade-point averages and standardized test scores. Four decades later, Proposition 48 remains one of the NCAA's most controversial decisions a policy its architects said would protect academic standards but which critics viewed as a blunt instrument that disproportionately punished Black athletes and students from underfunded schools."

"Rice wasn't alone in that stigma. In the fall of 1986, 401 recruits were ineligible to compete that season under the new rule. In football, 81% of players ruled ineligible were Black, according to the NCAA. These student-athletes arrived on campuses as recruited prospects but were immediately marked as academic failures, unable to practice with teams or suit up for games, their scholarships intact but their status uncertain."

Proposition 48 tied freshman athletic eligibility to minimum grade-point averages and standardized test scores, enacted by NCAA member schools in 1986. The rule barred hundreds of freshmen from competition based on test scores many educators questioned as measures of college readiness. A disproportionate number of ineligible athletes were Black — in football, 81% of ruled-ineligible players were Black. Recruited prospects arrived on campuses unable to practice or play, facing stigma although scholarships remained intact. The policy's architects framed it as protecting academic standards, while critics called it a blunt instrument that punished students from underfunded schools. The policy's legacy continues to shape debates over testing and racial equity.

Read at www.theguardian.com